A political news post website for independent-minded conservatives and others who may be interested in the sane side of American politics. Remember, the American people love their liberty. It is in their DNA!

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

THE MASSACHUSETTS SPECIAL ELECTION HAVE THE DUMBOCRATS PEEING IN THEIR PANTS - THIS IS HILARIOUS TO SEE THEM SWEAT AT THE THOUGHT OF LOSING!

JANUARY 17, 2010 - THE SCOTT BROWN BRIGADE PEOPLE'S RALLY - (VIDEO)

DAILY HEADLINES CONCERNING THIS INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT STORY CAN BE FOUND FURTHER DOWN ON THIS NEWS POST -

THE MOST IMPORTANT RACE
OF 2010 IS NOT IN NOVEMBER...




VOLUNTEER - DONATE - AND PRAY UNCEASINGLY FOR A MIRACLE ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 19, 2010 - ELECT SCOTT BROWN AND DEFEAT THE DEMONIC OBAMA CABAL!


SCOTT BROWN: A CHAMPION FOR KEEPING AMERICA SECURE

WILL THIS MAN END DEM SUPER MAJORITY?






MORE HEADLINES:

IT IS SUCH A PLEASURE TO SEE THE DUMBOCRATS SQUIRM!

HERE ARE THE LATEST HEADLINES:

Top Mass. election official: Seating Senate winner could be delayed...

Barney Frank lashes out over accusations that Mass. Dems would stall Brown certification ...

UP-TO-THE-MINUTE HEALTH CARE HATE BILL HEADLINES:

THE DANGEROUS, DEMONIC MARXIST MAFIA TYRANNICAL TRIO -

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA,
HARRY REID
NANCY PELOSI -

THEY MUST BE STOPPED!

JANUARY 15, 2010





JANUARY 13, 2010

SARAH PALIN MAKES HER DEBUT AS FOX NEWS COMMENTATOR - WELCOME SARAH, WE LOVE YOU!

PalinImage1.jpg image by tuberaider1

THE LEFTIE, SAUL ALINSKY, MARXIST, MAO-LOVIN' IDIOT LIBBIE DEMOCRAT LOONS ARE GOING CRAZY1

IT'S JEALOUSLY STUPID!

THEY ARE SO AFRAID OF SARAH AND HER SOLID, UNWAVERING CONSERVATIVE POLICIES, THAT THEY SPEND THEIR TIME CONSTANTLY BLABBING LIES ABOUT HER, WHILE THEIR RATINGS CONTINUE TO TANK BIG TIME!

KEEP BLABBING YOU ENVIOUS IDIOTS. EVENTUALLY YOU WILL IMPLODE JUST LIKE OBAMA AND HIS RADICAL CHICAGO-STYLE THUG ENTOURAGE, WHILE THE DEMONIC, DUMBOCRAT CONGRESS AND SENATE KEEP DIVING LOWER IN THE POLLS EACH DAY!


ABOVE: SARAH PALIN ON THE BILL O'REILLY SHOW - JANUARY 12, 2010


SARAH PALIN ON THE GLENN BECK SHOW - JANUARY 13, 2010 - PLEASE SEE THE GLENN BECK SHOW SCHEDULE - JANUARY 13TH ON THE RIGHT- HAND-SIDE RESOURCE CENTER. -> -> ->


BELOW: SARAH PALIN ON THE SEAN HANNITY SHOW - JANUARY 14,2010

TAXING MEDICARE - DETAILS THAT HARM PATIENTS



A NEW LEVY ON MEDICARE ADVANTAGE PLANS WOULD HURT LOWER-INCOME SENIORS THE MOST

While rushing to save a patient, a physician's first responsibility is to "do no harm." That requires remembering that sometimes a treatment can make things worse. And so it should be with the health-care reform moving through Congress. Clearly this issue is too big and too important to ignore. For America's sake, reform needs to happen. But it's also too complex an issue to rush a treatment with details that might cause harm.

Most of us agree that America's health-care system needs to be fixed. Families and businesses are struggling to keep pace with soaring costs. Too many Americans are without adequate coverage. And all of this is damaging our economy. But it will do no good to reform the system if it ends up degrading the quality of care most of us currently receive or saddling future generations of Americans with unconscionable debt.

As always, the devil is in the details, and we'd better be paying very close attention to their rich potential for unintended consequences. For example, one provision in the Senate's version of health-care reform would impose a new tax on a number of federally-funded health-care benefits.

In effect, the federal government would be taxing the money it provides for Medicare and a host of other important programs. By so doing, it would unintentionally jeopardize the quality of care that many of our oldest, sickest and most vulnerable citizens depend on.

OpinionJournal Related Stories:

•Review & Outlook: $222 Billion, Ho Hum
•Mark Constantian:
Where U.S. Health Care Ranks Number One
•Darrell Kirch:
How to Fix the Doctor Shortage

The Senate legislation imposes this yearly premium tax on for-profit and not-for-profit health plans, generating an estimated $60 billion in tax revenues over its first nine years. Government-run programs would be exempt from the tax. However, the tax would be levied on Medicare, the Children's Health Insurance Program, Medicaid, and Tri-Care for the families of military dependents when delivered by a private-sector plan.

Large private-sector health plans offering a diverse line of products would likely recover the cost of the tax by raising premiums on their other products.

But for those health plans specializing in Medicare, Medicaid and other government programs, there would be no such option. These providers are strictly bound by federal contracts and frequently operate at or near cost, serving America's older, higher-risk and higher-cost patient populations. Since they have no profits with which to absorb the tax or any ability to pass it on, they'll have only one option—to reduce the health-care services they provide. Certainly this isn't what the Senate intends.

Nonetheless, some 10.2 million Americans who now choose to purchase Medicare Advantage through private providers because it gives them better benefits at lower cost may be hurt. These are frequently lower-income elderly people with a multitude of serious health problems. The services they receive allow many of them to remain in their homes close to friends and family during their final years, rather than be moved into nursing homes where their care would be far more expensive and their days much emptier. They would be among the victims of this new federal tax.

What kind of Americans are we talking about? Here are a few real examples: An 89-year-old woman who lives alone recovering from a mastectomy, who has osteoarthritis, glaucoma and degenerative joint disease. An 81-year-old gentleman living in his daughter's home who has bone, liver and bladder cancer. An elderly couple where the wife has trouble walking because of arthritis, while the husband suffers from Alzheimer's requiring 24-hour care. These are the kind of people health-care reform should be helping, not hurting. Extending benefits to some Americans by cutting care for others isn't reform—it's unfair.

Fixing our nation's health-care system is a historic undertaking. As Congress works toward a solution, I encourage my former colleagues to pay very close attention to the details and be mindful of the unintended consequences of what they do today, because the impact of their decisions will be with us for generations. A treatment that leaves the system in worse shape isn't a cure.

MAYO CLINIC IN AZ TO STOP TREATING SOME MEDICARE PATIENTS AS OBAMA BEMOANS

THIS IS A FORECAST OF WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF OBAMA AND HIS MARXIST DUMBOCRATS CUT FUNDING AND TAX LOW INCOME SENIORS MEDICARE ADVANTAGE COVERAGE -


Medicare and the Mayo Clinic

PRESIDENT OBAMA is a great admirer of the Mayo Clinic. Time and again he has extolled it as an outstanding model of health care excellence and efficiency.

“Look at what the Mayo Clinic is able to do,’’ the president proclaimed at a rally in September. “It’s got the best quality and the lowest cost of just about any system in the country. . . . We want to help the whole country learn from what Mayo is doing.’’ On the White House website, you can find more than a dozen examples of Obama’s esteem.

So perhaps the president will give some thought to the clinic’s recent decision to stop accepting Medicare payments at its primary care facility in Glendale, Ariz. More than 3,000 patients will have to start paying cash if they wish to continue being seen by doctors at the clinic; those unable or unwilling to do so must look for new physicians. For now, Mayo is limiting the change in policy to its Glendale facility. But it may be just a matter of time before it drops Medicare at its other facilities in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota as well.

Why would an institution renowned for providing health care of “the best quality and the lowest cost’’ choose to sever its ties with the government’s flagship single-payer insurance program? Because the relationship is one it can’t afford. Last year, the Mayo Clinic lost $840 million on its Medicare patients. At the Glendale clinic, a Mayo spokesman told Bloomberg News, Medicare reimbursements covered only 50 percent of the cost of treating elderly primary-care patients. Not even the leanest, most efficient medical organization can keep doing business with a program that compels it to eat half its costs.

In breaking away from Medicare, the Mayo Clinic is hardly blazing a trail. Back in 2008, the independent Medicare Payment Advisory Commission reported that 29 percent of Medicare beneficiaries who were looking for a primary-care doctor were having difficulty finding one willing to treat them. A survey by the Texas Medical Association that year found that only 38 percent of the state’s primary-care physicians were accepting new Medicare patients.

But if you think that sounds grim, wait until Congress enacts the president’s health care overhaul. A central element of both the House and Senate versions of ObamaCare is that Medicare reimbursements to hospitals and doctors - already so low that many providers lose money each time they treat a Medicare patient - will be forced lower still.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, a branch of the US Department of Health and Human Services, estimated last month that the Senate bill would squeeze $493 billion out of Medicare over the next 10 years. As a result, it cautioned, “providers for whom Medicare constitutes a substantive portion of their business could find it difficult to remain profitable and . . . might end their participation in the program (possibly jeopardizing access to care for beneficiaries).’’ In short, the Democratic understanding of health care reform - more government power to set prices, combined with reduced freedom for individuals - will make medical care harder to come by: an Economics 101 lesson in the pitfalls of price controls.

Nearly six months ago, the Mayo Clinic tried to sound an alarm. Instead of making American health care better and more affordable, it warned, the legislation working its way through Congress “will do the opposite’’ and “the real losers will be the citizens of the United States.’’

Each year Medicare loses tens of billions of dollars to fraud and abuse. The program’s long-term deficit is a staggering $38 trillion. Its expenditures have raced ahead of inflation from the day it was created: Medicare’s price tag has skyrocketed from $3 billion in 1966 to $453 billion this year. Yet its reimbursement of medical providers is so meager that more and more of them cannot afford to treat Medicare patients. Whatever else Medicare might be, it is no model for rational reform.

Obama says he wants the country to “learn from what Mayo is doing.’’ What Mayo is doing is trying to provide high-quality medical care in the face of Washington’s compulsively misguided interference. As 3,000 Mayo patients have just learned, government interference can hurt. Ratchet up that interference with ObamaCare, and the pain will grow worse.


THE ABOVE GRAPHIC IS A PICTURE OF ONE OF THE MOST DANGEROUS, IGNORANT DUMBOCRAT MARXISTS IN UNITED STATES HISTORY. HE WANTS TO RUN THE COUNTRY LIKE THE COMMUNITY ORGANIZER THAT HE IS.....AND THAT IS ALREADY PROVING TO BE A DISASTER!

MARTIN LUTHER KING'S NEICE, THE REVEREND ALVEDA KING, DOES NOT SEE COMPLIMENT IN HARRY REID'S "NEGRO DIALECT" COMMENT

HARRY REID IS A DISGUSTING DISGRACE AND SHOULD RESIGN FROM HIS POST AS SENATE MAJORITY LEADER!



The Rev. Al Sharpton, the Congressional Black Caucus and the NAACP all jumped to the defense of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid after his controversial remarks about President Obama, but the niece of Martin Luther King Jr. is calling Reid's comments "sadly outrageous."


"If Michael Steele or any other conservative had said anything like it, the remarks would be labeled racist and plastered over every available news outlet," Alveda King said in a statement released Tuesday.


"What would my uncle and my father think, to hear such things from one of the most powerful leaders in the country? Their 'beloved community' is sorely threatened when racism rears its ugly head once again."


Sen. Russ Fiengold did his own soul searching after Reid was quoted in a book saying candidate Barack Obama in 2008 could benefit from being light-skinned and not having a "Negro dialect" unless he wants one. Feingold told a local television station late Monday that he's still mulling whether Reid should stay or step down as majority leader.


"I'm thinking about that and we're going to be getting together as a caucus next week, and that topic will come up. I have not decided whether these comments merit that or not," Feingold told ABC affiliate WISN. "They're very unfortunate. They should have never been said. So I need to think about it."


But on Tuesday, he closed rank around the embattled leader. An aide to Feingold told Fox News the Wisconsin senator communicated through a senior member of his staff to Reid that he backs him as majority leader and is no longer unsure if Reid should remain in that position.


Some progressives bloggers, however, fearing Reid is a liability, said he should step down now so Democrats have a better chance of keeping the Nevada Senate seat in November. And while Reid reportedly called RainbowPush head Jesse Jackson to apologize after the gaffe was reported, Jackson has been uncharacteristically quiet on the racially tinged matter.

Reid said Monday that he "could have used a better choice of words," and he signaled that he's moving on.


"We have a lot to do," Reid said. "I feel good about people reaching out to me. I've apologized to the president. ... I'm not going to dwell on this anymore."


Other leading Democrats, including President Obama, have accepted Reid's apology, while conceding that he used inappropriate language. But critics say it's not Obama who needs an apology but Americans who Reid presumed would hesitate to vote for a black man.


Steele, the first black chairman of the Republican National Committee, is among those Republicans calling for Reid to step down. He and others say Democrats are operating by a double-standard, since they were insistent that former Senate Republican Leader Trent Lott step down in 2002 after he praised the late Sen. Strom Thurmond, a former segregationist, at his 100th birthday party.Feingold said Lott's remarks were more insensitive than Reid's.


Obama, in an interview with TV One, called Reid a "stalwart champion ... of civil rights" and a "good man" who meant no offense.


"For him to have used some inartful language in trying to praise me, and for people to try to make hay out of that makes absolutely no sense," Obama said. "He apologized, recognizing that he didn't use appropriate language, but there was nothing mean-spirited in what he had to say and he's always been on the right side of the issues."


Nevada's other senator, John Ensign, a Republican, said Monday that lawmakers should accept Reid's apology. Republican Sens. John McCain and Mitch McConnell, the minority leader, said a determination on Reid's fate should be made among Nevada voters and the Democratic caucus, respectively.

View Image***Califstarheart ***