A political news post website for independent-minded conservatives and others who may be interested in the sane side of American politics. Remember, the American people love their liberty. It is in their DNA!

Saturday, August 15, 2009

SO.....YOU WANT SOCIALIZED HEALTH CARE DO YOU? / WELL TAKE A LOOK AT WHAT YOU GET IN CANADA / A TRUE EXPERIENCE VIDEO

























HOW IT REALLY WORKS IN CANADA -


GET READY FOR THIS - SIT DOWN AND TAKE A DEEP BREATH...............





NO WONDER A LOT OF CANADIANS CROSS THE BORDER INTO THE UNITED STATES TO GET MEDICAL CARE. YOU WOULD TOO IF YOU ENCOUNTERED THE KIND OF "TREATMENT" SHOWN ON THE VIDEO!


SOCIALIZED MEDICAL CARE IS BAD! - OBAMACARE WILL BE HORRENDOUS - JUST DOWNRIGHT DANGEROUS TO YOUR HEALTH!


PLEASE CONTACT ALL FEDERAL REPRESENTATIVES AND TELL THEM "NO" TO ANY TYPE GOVERNMENT MEDICAL CARE.


REMEMBER, WE ARE UNIQUE. WE MAKE OUR SYSTEMS WORK VIA THE FREE MARKET. TELL YOUR FEDERAL REPRESENTATIVES TO MAKE LAWS AGAINST FRIVILOUS MEDICAL LAWSUITS AND ALLOW CITIZENS TO PURCHASE THEIR MEDICAL INSURANCE FROM ANY COMPANY IN THE UNITED STATES, THUS OPENING UP REAL COMPETITION WHICH WILL LOWER COSTS.


SEE HOW SIMPLE IT WOULD BE TO REMEDY THE COST OF MEDICAL INSURANCE AND KEEP THE DAMNED GOVERNMENT OUT OF OUR LIVES?!!!
IT WOULD BE INSANE, DOWNRIGHT STUPID TO DO IT ANY OTHER WAY.

FROM JUDICIAL WATCH / LOS ANGELES COUNTY TAXPAYERS PAY 48 MILLION DOLLARS PER MONTH FOR "ANCHOR BABY" TAB!

** ILLEGAL ALIENS AT MAY DAY MARCH IN LOS ANGELES **




















IT IS AMAZING THAT THE COST TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR ILLEGAL ALIEN PERKS IS A WHOPPING 13 BILLION DOLLARS TO BE EXACT. THAT IS HALF OF THE CALIFORNIA DEBT OWED IN 2009.


HERE IS AN ARTICLE THAT DESCRIBES ONLY A FRACTION OF THE TOTAL OF WELFARE PERKS THAT THE CITY AND COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES PAYS EACH MONTH TO ILLEGAL ALIENS.

THE ARTICLE BELOW FOCUSES ON BENEFITS FOR ILLEGAL ALIEN "ANCHOR BABIES".

ARTICLE - FROM JUDICIAL WATCH
L.A.County's $48 Million Monthly Anchor Baby TabViewDiscussionLast Updated: Wed, 08/12/2009 - 11:24amTaxpayers in the nation’s most populous county dished out nearly $50 million in a single month to cover only the welfare costs of illegal immigrants, representing a whopping $10 million increase over the same one-month period two years ago.
In June 2009 alone Los Angeles County spent $48 million ($26 million in food stamps and $22 million in welfare) to provide just two of numerous free public services to the children of illegal aliens, which will translate into an annual tab of nearly $600 million for the cash-strapped county.
The figure doesn’t even include the exorbitant cost of educating, medically treating or incarcerating illegal aliens in the sprawling county of about 10 million residents.
Los Angeles County annually spends more than $1 billion for those combined services, including $400 million for healthcare and $350 million for public safety.
The recent single-month welfare figure was obtained from the county’s Department of Social Services and made public by a county supervisor (Michael Antonovich) who assures illegal immigration continues to have a “catastrophic impact on Los Angeles County taxpayers.” The veteran lawmaker points out that 24% of the county’s total allotment of welfare and food stamp benefits goes directly to the children of illegal aliens—known as anchor babies—born in the United States.
A former fifth-grade history teacher who has served on the county’s board for nearly three decades, Antonovich has repeatedly come under fire for publicizing statistics that confirm the devastation illegal immigration has had on the region. Antonovich represents a portion of the county that is roughly twice the size of Rhode Island and has about 2 million residents.
Numerous other reports have documented the enormous cost of illegal immigration on a national level. Just last year a renowned economist, who has thoroughly researched the impact of illegal immigration, published a book breaking down the country’s $346 billion annual cost to educate, jail, medically treat and incarcerate illegal aliens throughout the U.S.

SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE NANCY PELOSI DOES IT AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN / THIS WOMAN NEEDS TO BE VOTED OUT OF OFFICE, THE SOONER THE BETTER!

2006 FLASHBACK - Pelosi tells Anti-War Protesters, "I am a fan of Disruptors"

Nancy Pelosi is such a moronic, malicious liar and most of all a congenital hypocrite that just does not quit. How many times can she get away with her insane comments against the townhall protesters?

PLEASE TAKE A LOOK AT THIS 2006 VIDEO OF OUR SO-CALLED SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE NANCY PELOSI:

http://www.breitbart.tv/06-flashback-pelosi-tells-anti-war-protesters-im-a-fan-of-disruptors/



Friday, August 14, 2009

DR. RAND PAUL, M.D., OPTHAMOLOGIST / NOW RUNNING FOR THE UNITED STATES SENATE IN KENTUCKY / THIS IS ONE TO WATCH AND SUPPORT FOR THE 2010 ELECTION














ACTIVIST NEWS AND COMMENTARY / HEALTH CARE STIRS UP WHOLE FOODS CEO JOHN MACKEY



CUSTOMERS BOYCOTT ORGANIC GROCERY STORE


YES! YES! YES!
We independent-minded conservative activists will make sure that we shop at Whole foods. We thank Whole foods CEO, John Mackey for speaking up with the truth!

ARTICLE:

Joshua has been taking the bus to his local Whole Foods in New York City every five days for the past two years. This week, he said he'll go elsewhere to fulfill his fresh vegetable and organic produce needs.

Customers are threatening to boycott Whole Foods stores after the company's CEO, John Mackey, wrote an op-ed discussing his ideas for health care reform.(Getty Images)More Photos
"I will never shop there again," vowed Joshua, a 45-year-old blogger, who asked that his last name not be published.
Like many of his fellow health food fanatics, Joshua said he will no longer patronize the store after learning about Whole Foods Market Inc.'s CEO John Mackey's views on health care reform, which were made public this week in an op-ed piece he wrote for The Wall Street Journal.
Michael Lent, another Whole Foods enthusiast in Long Beach, Calif., told ABCNews.com that he, too, will turn to other organic groceries for his weekly shopping list.

TO READ THE REMAINDER OF THE STORY, CLICK ON LINK BELOW -


FROM AN ACTIVIST / AAAARRRRGGGGHHHHH, WHEN I TRY TO LISTEN TO THE OBAMA GIBBERISH WHILE HE EXPLAINS HIS SO-CALLED HEALTH CARE PLAN, I GET A HEADACHE

.....AND MY EARS BLEED!

AFTER LISTENING TO TWO OF HIS OBVIOUSLY STAGED SO-CALLED HEALTH CARE TOWN HALL MEETINGS.....I HAVE THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:

DID ANYONE EVER NOTICE THAT WHEN OBAMA IS NOT USING THE TELEPROMPTER, HE GOES INTO TALKING WITH A "STREET"
ACCENT, WHILE NERVOUSLY STAMMERING AND WITH DISJOINTED WORDS?

AND DOES ANYONE GET THE IMPRESSION THAT HE DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS TALKING
ABOUT? - JUST ASKING.....
- AN ACTIVIST -

BONUS - Meet some of Obama's friends that perhaps you have not had the dubious pleasure of meeting (Video) Watch it all and you will see what we mean.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNCILi1odyw

***Califstarheart ***sunset or sunrise
View Image

RONALD REAGAN SPEAKS AGAINST SOCIALIZED MEDICINE IN 1961 - VIDEO

“Whatever else history may say about me when I’m gone, I hope it will record that I appealed to your best hopes, not your worst fears; to your confidence rather than your doubts. My dream is that you will travel the road ahead with liberty’s lamp guiding your steps and opportunity’s arm steadying your way.” - Ronald Reagan -


RONALD REAGAN SPEAKS OUT AGAINST SOCIALIZED MEDICINE IN 1961

AUDIO TAPE -


RONALD REAGAN FOUNDATION LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CLICK LINK BELOW -



WHAT SOME CORRUPT, SELF-SERVING POLITICIANS COULD LEARN FROM HARRY TRUMAN

Harry Truman was a different kind of President. He probably made as many important decisions regarding our nation's history as any of the other 42 Presidents. However, a measure of his greatness may rest on what he did after he left the White House.

The only asset he had when he died was the house he lived in, which was in Independence Missouri . His wife had inherited The house from her mother and other than their years in the White House, they lived their entire lives there.

When he retired from office in 1952, his income was a U.S. Army pension reported to have been $13,507.72 a year.

Congress, noting that he was paying for his stamps and personally licking them, granted him an 'allowance' and, later, a retroactive pension of $25,000 per year.

After President Eisenhower was inaugurated, Harry and Bess drove home to Missouri by themselves. There were no Secret Service following them.

When offered corporate positions at large salaries, he declined, stating, "You don't want me. You want the office of the President, and that doesn't belong to me. It belongs to the American people and it's not for sale."

Even later, on May 6, 1971, when Congress was preparing to award him the Medal of Honor on his 87th birthday, he refused to accept it, writing, "I don't consider that I have done anything which should be the reason for any award, Congressional or otherwise."

As president he paid for all of his own travel expenses and food.

Modern politicians have found a new level of success in cashing in on the Presidency, resulting in untold wealth.

Today, many in Congress also have found a way to become quite wealthy while enjoying the fruits of their offices.
Political offices are now for sale. (sic. Illinois ).

Good old Harry Truman was correct when he observed, "My choices in life were either to be a piano player in a whore house or a politician. And to tell the truth, there's hardly any difference!
I say dig him up and clone him!!

THE FOX NEWS CHANNEL HANNITY SPECIAL THAT WAS NOT SHOWN - HERE IT IS! 'OBAMA AND FRIENDS - A HISTORY OF RADICALISM'



































THERE ARE SEVERAL PARTS THAT COMPLETE THE SHOW - TAKE YOUR TIME AND PLEASE DO NOT MISS ANY OF THEM!

VIDEO COLLECTION -

Thursday, August 13, 2009

ACTIVIST COMMENTARY AND FACT / NANCY PELOSI - SOMEONE JUST SUGGESTED THAT WE SHOULD IMPEACH THIS DUMB BROAD!




WHERE DID WE EVER GET AN IDIOTIC, CONNIVING, MALICIOUS MORON LIKE THIS SO-CALLED SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE???
HERE IS ANOTHER ONE OF HER INSANE IDEAS -
Windfall Tax on Retirement IncomeAdding a tax to your retirement is simply another way of saying to the American people, you're so darn stupid that we're going to keep doing this until we drain every cent from you. That's what the Speaker of the House is saying. Read below.................

Nancy Pelosi wants a Windfall Tax on Retirement Income. In other words tax what you have made by investing toward your retirement.

This woman is a nut case! You aren't going to believe this. Madam speaker Nancy Pelosi wants to put a Windfall Tax on all stock market profits (including Retirement fund, 401K and Mutual Funds!

Alas, it is true - all to help the 12 Million Illegal Immigrants and other unemployed Minorities!

This woman is frightening.She quotes...' We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income, (didn't Marx say something like this?), in our country and at the same time limiting the amount the rich can invest.' (I am not rich, are you?)

When asked how these new tax dollars would be spent, she replied:'We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, unempl oyed and minorities. For example, we have an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in our country who need our help along with millions of unemployed minorities. Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long way to guarantee these people the standard of living they would like to have as 'Americans'.'!
(Read that quote again and again and let it sink in.) 'Lower your retirement, give it to others who have not worked as you have for it'.

GEEEEEEEEEEEZZZZZZ!

IMPORTANT ARTICLES AND VIDEO(S) ABOUT EZEKIEL EMANUEL, M.D. AND OBAMA'S HORRIFIC SO-CALLED HEALTH CARE BILL



'The Allocation of Scarce Medical Interventions'

Please read this material co-written by *Ezekiel Emanuel, M.D., Obama's so-called Health Czar.

You will see one of the
reasons why the American citizens are angry and protesting Obama's horrific health care bill:

ARTICLE-http://www.scribd.com/doc/18280675/Principles-for-Allocation-of-Scarce-Medical-Interventions

VIDEO - Radio talk show host, Mark Levin and guest, Betsy Mc Caughey, M.D., (pronounced "Mc Coy") the former Governor of New York. She has called Dr. Emanuel, the "Jeremiah Wright of health care". Dr. Mc Caughey has a lot to say about Obama's so-called health care bill that she has read from cover to cover.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aU9qPGQ2BmE

ARTICLE - By Shannon Love, The Dangers of Decompartmentalized health Care Spending. This is a brilliantly-written article that must be read.

http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/8627.html
* Notation about Dr. Ezkiel Emanuel, M.D. - He is the brother of Obama's Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel. Rahm is a part of the corrupt Chicago political mob that occupies the West Wing of the White House. Isn't nepotism wonderful for those of the same devious mind-set? Very cozy, don't you think?

More articles and videos will be added to this post over the next few days.....

SARAH PALIN WRITES - RE: CONCERNING THE "DEATH PANELS"


















CONCERNING THE "DEATH PANELS"

Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 8:55 PM Yesterday President Obama responded to my statement that Democratic health care proposals would lead to rationed care; that the sick, the elderly, and the disabled would suffer the most under such rationing; and that under such a system these “unproductive” members of society could face the prospect of government bureaucrats determining whether they deserve health care.
The President made light of these concerns. He said:“Let me just be specific about some things that I’ve been hearing lately that we just need to dispose of here. The rumor that’s been circulating a lot lately is this idea that somehow the House of Representatives voted for death panels that will basically pull the plug on grandma because we’ve decided that we don’t, it’s too expensive to let her live anymore....It turns out that I guess this arose out of a provision in one of the House bills that allowed Medicare to reimburse people for consultations about end-of-life care, setting up living wills, the availability of hospice, etc. So the intention of the members of Congress was to give people more information so that they could handle issues of end-of-life care when they’re ready on their own terms. It wasn’t forcing anybody to do anything.” [1]
The provision that President Obama refers to is Section 1233 of HR 3200, entitled “Advance Care Planning Consultation.” [2] With all due respect, it’s misleading for the President to describe this section as an entirely voluntary provision that simply increases the information offered to Medicare recipients. The issue is the context in which that information is provided and the coercive effect these consultations will have in that context.Section 1233 authorizes advanced care planning consultations for senior citizens on Medicare every five years, and more often “if there is a significant change in the health condition of the individual ... or upon admission to a skilled nursing facility, a long-term care facility... or a hospice program." [3]
During those consultations, practitioners must explain “the continuum of end-of-life services and supports available, including palliative care and hospice,” and the government benefits available to pay for such services. [4]Now put this in context. These consultations are authorized whenever a Medicare recipient’s health changes significantly or when they enter a nursing home, and they are part of a bill whose stated purpose is “to reduce the growth in health care spending.” [5]
Is it any wonder that senior citizens might view such consultations as attempts to convince them to help reduce health care costs by accepting minimal end-of-life care? As Charles Lane notes in the Washington Post, Section 1233 “addresses compassionate goals in disconcerting proximity to fiscal ones.... If it’s all about alleviating suffering, emotional or physical, what’s it doing in a measure to “bend the curve” on health-care costs?” [6]
As Lane also points out:
Though not mandatory, as some on the right have claimed, the consultations envisioned in Section 1233 aren’t quite “purely voluntary,” as Rep. Sander M. Levin (D-Mich.) asserts. To me, “purely voluntary” means “not unless the patient requests one.” Section 1233, however, lets doctors initiate the chat and gives them an incentive -- money -- to do so. Indeed, that’s an incentive to insist.
Patients may refuse without penalty, but many will bow to white-coated authority. Once they’re in the meeting, the bill does permit “formulation” of a plug-pulling order right then and there. So when Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) denies that Section 1233 would “place senior citizens in situations where they feel pressured to sign end-of-life directives that they would not otherwise sign,” I don’t think he’s being realistic. [7]
Even columnist Eugene Robinson, a self-described “true believer” who “will almost certainly support” “whatever reform package finally emerges”, agrees that “If the government says it has to control health-care costs and then offers to pay doctors to give advice about hospice care, citizens are not delusional to conclude that the goal is to reduce end-of-life spending.” [8]
So are these usually friendly pundits wrong? Is this all just a “rumor” to be “disposed of”, as President Obama says? Not according to Democratic New York State Senator Ruben Diaz, Chairman of the New York State Senate Aging Committee, who writes:Section 1233 of House Resolution 3200 puts our senior citizens on a slippery slope and may diminish respect for the inherent dignity of each of their lives.... It is egregious to consider that any senior citizen ... should be placed in a situation where he or she would feel pressured to save the government money by dying a little sooner than he or she otherwise would, be required to be counseled about the supposed benefits of killing oneself, or be encouraged to sign any end of life directives that they would not otherwise sign. [9]
Of course, it’s not just this one provision that presents a problem. My original comments concerned statements made by Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, a health policy advisor to President Obama and the brother of the President’s chief of staff. Dr. Emanuel has written that some medical services should not be guaranteed to those “who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens....An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia.” [10] Dr. Emanuel has also advocated basing medical decisions on a system which “produces a priority curve on which individuals aged between roughly 15 and 40 years get the most chance, whereas the youngest and oldest people get chances that are attenuated.” [11]
President Obama can try to gloss over the effects of government authorized end-of-life consultations, but the views of one of his top health care advisors are clear enough. It’s all just more evidence that the Democratic legislative proposals will lead to health care rationing, and more evidence that the top-down plans of government bureaucrats will never result in real health care reform.
See http://edlabor.house.gov/documents/111/pdf/publications/AAHCA-BillText-071409.pdf[3] See HR 3200 sec. 1233 (hhh)(1); Sec. 1233 (hhh)(3)(B)(1), above.[4] See HR 3200 sec. 1233 (hhh)(1)(E), above.[5]

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

FROM THE WALL STREET JOURNAL' / 'OBAMA'S TONE-DEAF HEALTH CAMPAIGN'





It didn't take chaotic town-hall meetings, raging demonstrators and consequent brooding in various sectors of the media to bring home the truth that the campaign for a health-care bill is, to put it mildly, not going awfully well.

It's not hard now to envision the state of this crusade with just a month or two more of diligent management by the Obama team—think train wreck.

It may one day be otherwise in the more perfect world of universal coverage, but for now disabilities like the tone deafness that afflicts this administration from the top down are uninsurable.

Consider former ABC reporter Linda Douglass—now the president's communications director for health reform—who set about unmasking all the forces out there "always trying to scare people when you try to bring them health insurance reform." People, she charged, are taking sentences out of context and otherwise working to present a misleading picture of the president's proposals.

One of her key solutions to this problem—her justly famed message encouraging citizens to contact the office at flag@whitehouse.gov if they got an email or other information about health reform "that seems fishy"—set off a riotous flow of online responses. (The word "fishy," with its police detective tone, would have done the trick all by itself.)

These commentaries, packed with allusions to the secret police, the East German Stasi and Orwell, were mostly furious. Others quite simply hilarious. Ms. Douglass, who now has, in her public appearances, the air of a person consigned to service in a holy order, was not amused.

TO READ THE ENTIRE STORY, PLEASE CLICK ON THIS LINK:
RELATED ARTICLES AND VIDEOS -

Rep. Dingell (D-MI): They're Like the KKK
Health care protesters in North New Jersey:
Obana health care bill - Home visitation - How to raise your children: http://townhall.com/columnists/ChuckNorris/2009/08/11/dirty_secret_no_1_in_obamacare