A political news post website for independent-minded conservatives and others who may be interested in the sane side of American politics. Remember, the American people love their liberty. It is in their DNA!

Saturday, August 8, 2009

THE LIBERAL-FASCISTS ARE BANNING COMMONLY USED WORDS! TYRANNY HAS COME TO THE U.S.A.
































THE WAYS AND MEANS OF OBAMA, A TWISTED TYRANT AND HIS RADICAL ENTOURAGE. EVIDENCE SHOWS THAT HIS MESMERIZED LIBERAL VOTERS ARE QUICKLY WAKING UP AND SEEING WHAT HE REALLY IS AND THE HARM THAT HE IS DOING TO OUR BEAUTIFUL AMERICA.....
On some level of the convoluted Obama dictatorial echelon, radical left-wing cronies are now deciding that the citizens of the United States are banned from using common english words. What is next, instituting a language czar and the word police? Obama and his tyrannical cohorts, including Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Chris Dodd, Barney Frank and countless other idiot radical left-wing nitwits will be voted out in 2010 and 2010.

Let us all make sure that we DO use all of the banned words as many times each day as possible. How dare they insult the American people!

What gaul! What nerve!

THIS VIDEO WILL EXPLAIN IT ALL:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9W0V7Qk3lrI&feature=autoshare_twitter

Everyone needs to attend the their state textbook meetings and also write to your state and let them know that this nonsense is not, nor will ever be acceptable. This is not Nicaragua or the U.S.S.R.



THE MEANING OF THE WORD ECHELON:

Any of the levels of responsibility or importance in an organization the persons at one of these levels.
A level of command, authority, or rank: the top echelon of city, county, state or federal officials.


THE DECLINE OF CALIFORNIA AND HOW IT HAPPENED / THIS COMMENTARY BASED ON FACT IS HOW CALIFORNIA BECAME A FAILED STATE

THIS IS AN INCREDIBLY WELL THOUGHT OUT, AND WELL WRITTEN FACTUAL COMMENTARY BY TOM MC CLINTOCK.

ADDITIONAL SPACING HAS BEEN UTILIZED TO MAKE IT EASIER TO READ AND TO HELP DIGEST THE INFORMATION
PROVIDED IN THE COMMENTARY.


Tom McClintock is a former California state Assemblyman and Senator. He currently represents a California district in the U.S. House of Representatives.

California as a warning for America July 13th, 2009, 4:59 pm · 5 Comments · posted by Steven Greenhut


Congressman Tom McClintock offered remarks in Washington, D.C., on Friday to the Competitive Enterprise Institute and Pacific Research Institute that clearly illustrate why California is facing such a large fiscal mess.


His beginning joke is so funny because it is so true: "I know that everybody likes to poke fun at California - but I can tell you right now that despite all of its problems, California remains one of the best places in the world to build a successful small business. All you have to do is start with a successful large business."


Here is the rest of the speech:


Laugh if you will, but let me remind you that when these policies finish wrecking California, there are still 49 other states we can all move to - and yours is one of them.

I should also warn you of the strange sense of déjà-vu that I have every day on the House floor as I watch the same folly and blunders that wrecked California now being passed with reckless abandon in this Congress.


We passed a "Cash-for-Clunkers" bill the other day - we did that years ago in California.


Doubling the entire debt every five years? Been there.


Increasing spending at unsustainable rates? Done that.


Save-the-Planet-Carbon-Dioxide restrictions? Got the T-Shirt.


To understand how these policies can utterly destroy an economy and bankrupt a government, you have to remember the Golden State in its Golden Age.


A generation ago, California spent about half what it does today AFTER adjusting for both inflation and population growth. And yet, we had the finest highway system in the world and the finest public school system in the country.


California offered a FREE university education to every Californian who wanted one.


We produced water and electricity so cheaply that many communities didn't bother to measure the stuff.


Our unemployment rate consistently ran well below the national rate and its diversified economy was nearly recession-proof.


One thing - and one thing only - has changed in those years: public policy.


The political Left gradually gained dominance over California's government and has imposed a disastrous agenda of radical and retrograde policies that have destroyed the quality of life that Californians once took for granted.


The Census Bureau reports that in the last two years 2/3 of a million more people have moved out of California than have moved into it.


Many are leaving for the garden spots of Nevada, Arizona and Texas.


Think about that.


California is blessed with the most equitable climate in the entire Western Hemisphere; it has the most bountiful resources anywhere in the continental United States; it is poised on the Pacific Rim in a position to dominate world trade for the next century, and yet people are finding a better place to live and work and raise their families in the middle of the Nevada and Arizona and Texas deserts.


I submit to you that no conceivable act of God could wreak such devastation as to turn California into a less desirable place to live than the middle of the Nevada Nuclear Test Range.


Only Acts of Government can do that. And they have.


You can trace the collapse of California's economy to several critical events: the rise of environmental Ludditism beginning in 1974; the abandonment of constitutional checks and balances that once constrained spending and borrowing; and the rise of rule by public employee unions .


There are other factors as well: litigation, taxation, illegal immigration - but for the sake of time let me concentrate on the big three.


The first was the rise of environmental Ludditism with the election of a radical new-age leftist named Jerry Brown as governor of the state - an election that also produced overwhelming liberal majorities in both legislative houses.


Like Obama today, Brown lost little time in pursuing his vision of California - an incoherent combination of pastoral simplicity, European socialism and centralized planning.


At the center of this world view was a backward ideology that he called his "era of limits" - the naïve notion that public works were growth inducing and polluting and that stopping the expansion of infrastructure somehow excused government from meeting the needs of an expanding population.


Conservation replaced abundance as the chief aim of California's public works, and public policy was redirected to developing irresistible incentives for the population to concentrate in dense urban cores rather than to settle in suburban communities.


Brown infused his vision into every aspect of public policy, and it is a testament to his thoroughness and tenacity that its basic tenets have dominated the direction of California through both Republican and Democratic administrations.


He cancelled the state's highway construction program, abandoning many routes in mid-construction.


He cancelled long-planned water projects, conveyance facilities and dams.


He established the California Energy Commission that blocked approval of any significant new generating capacity.


He enacted volumes of environmental regulations that created severe impediments to home and commercial construction, empowering an incipient no-growth movement that began on the most extreme fringe of the environmental cause and quickly spread.


This movement reached its zenith with Arnold Schwarzenegger and the enactment of AB 32 and companion legislation in 2006. This measure gives virtually unchecked authority to the California Air Resources Board to force Draconian reductions in carbon dioxide emissions by 2020.


This has dire implications to entire segments of California's economy: agriculture, baking, distilling, cargo and passenger transportation, cement production, manufacturing, construction and energy production, to name a few.


We, too, were promised an explosion of "green jobs," but exactly the opposite has happened. Up until that bill took effect, California's unemployment numbers tracked very closely with the national unemployment rate.


But since then, California's unemployment rate began a steady upward divergence from the national jobless figures.


Today, California's unemployment rate is more than two points above the national rate, and at its highest point since 1941.


The second problem is structural: the collapse of the checks and balances and other constitutional and traditional constraints on government spending and borrowing. Let me mention a few of them:


The State Supreme Court decision in Serrano v. Priest severed the use of local revenue for local schools and invited the state take-over of public education.


AB 8 of 1979 - the legislature's response to Proposition 13 - essentially did the same thing to local governments generally.


This means that vast bureaucracies have grown up over the service delivery level, wasting more and more resources while hamstringing teachers in their classrooms, wardens in their prisons and city councils in their towns.


Next, constitutional constraints on fiscal excesses began to fall.


In 1983, Gov. George Deukmejian approved legislation to remove the governor's ability to make mid-year budget corrections without having to return to the legislature. The loss of this provision exposed the state to chronic deficit spending by removing any ability of the governor to rapidly respond to changing economic conditions.


In 1989, Deukmejian sponsored Proposition 111 that destroyed the Gann Spending Limit that had held increases in state spending to inflation and population growth. If that limit had remained intact, California would be enjoying a budget surplus today.


The disastrous tax increases by Pete Wilson in 1991 and Arnold Schwarzenegger this year were made possible by this tragic blunder.


Finally, we've watched the constitutional budget process that had produced relatively punctual and relatively balanced budgets for nearly 150 years collapse in favor of an extra-constitutional abomination called the big five.


That new process, that began under Pete Wilson and has culminated under Arnold Schwarzenegger bypasses the entire legislative deliberative process in favor of an annual deal struck between the governor and legislative leaders behind closed doors and handed to the legislature as a fait accompli.


This short-circuits the separation of powers that is designed to discipline fiscal excess and it literally bargains away the line-item veto authority of the governor. It is a process that allows legislative leaders to extract concessions from the executive that would not be possible if the separation of powers were maintained.


With the checks against excessive spending broken down, borrowing became the preferred method of public finance.


The Constitutional requirement that all taxpayer-supported debt be approved by voters began to erode in the 1930's, when a depression-era Supreme Court decision allowed the state to run a temporary deficit in the event of an economic down-turn - as long as the shortfall was addressed in the following fiscal year.


This practice was narrowly construed until the Wilson administration began using it to justify spreading out a single year's budget deficit over several years.


During the 1980's, Gov. Deukmejian began employing a legal fiction called a "lease revenue bond," to circumvent constitutionally required voter approval.


Although Proposition 13 still protects property owners from unsustainable increases in their property taxes, most of the other fiscal constraints are now gone, and California has entered a period of unprecedented public debt to finance an unprecedented expansion of state government.


The third factor that also can be traced back to the 1970's was the radical transformation that took place in the nature and power of the state's public employee unions.


Until that time, state law prohibited public employee strikes against the public and prohibited collective bargaining or closed shops.


During the Jerry Brown era, a series of collective bargaining acts handed to public sector unions all the rights and powers of private sector unions - but without any of the natural constraints on private sector unions.


The unions soon brought these newly-won powers to bear to elect hand-picked officials to state and local office.


Today, political expenditures by public employee unions exceed all other special interest groups, while they hold compliant majorities in the state legislature and most local agencies.


The result has been radically escalating personnel costs and radically deteriorating performance.


The impact on governmental services has been devastating. Despite exploding budgets, service delivery is collapsing.


Firing incompetent teachers has become a virtual impossibility, adding to the deterioration of educational quality.


Essential services can no longer be performed because labor costs have made it impossible to sustain those services.


Today, California is like the shopkeeper who leased out too much space, ordered too much inventory, hired too many people and paid them too much.


Every month the shopkeeper covers his shortfalls with borrowing and bookkeeping tricks.


Ultimately, he will reach a tipping point where anything he does makes his situation worse.


Borrowing costs are eating him alive and he's running out of credit.


Raising prices causes his sales to decline. And there's only so much discretionary spending he can cut.


That's the state's predicament in a nutshell.


California's borrowing costs now exceed the budget of the entire University of California and it is increasingly likely that it will fail to find lenders when it must borrow billions to pay its bills at the end of this month.


Ignoring dire warnings, Gov. Schwarzenegger and legislators from both parties earlier this year imposed the biggest state tax increase in American history.


And I can assure you that the Laffer curve is alive and well. In the first two months after the tax increase took effect, state revenues have plunged 33 percent.


Although there are many obsolete, duplicative or low priority programs and expenditures that the state can - and should - do without, there aren't enough of them to come anywhere close to closing California's deficit.


Sadly, California has reached the terminal stage of a bureaucratic state, where government has become so large and so tangled that it can no longer perform even basic functions.


Fortunately, we have a model that we know works.


A generation ago, it produced a high quality of public service at a much lower cost.


It maximized management flexibility and it required accountability at the service delivery level.


It recognized that only when commerce and enterprise flourish can we finance the basic responsibilities of government.


Restoring this efficiency will require a governor and a legislature with the political will to wrestle control from the public employee unions, dismantle the enormous bureaucracies that have grown up over the service delivery level, decentralize administration and decision making, contract out services that the private sector can provide more efficiently, rescind the recent tax increases that are costing the state money and roll back the regulatory obstacles to productive enterprise.


Alas, we don't have such leaders and even if we did, the systemic reorganization of the state government can't be accomplished overnight.


Restructuring the public schools would take at least a year; prisons at least two; and health and welfare three to five years before serious savings could be realized.


This brings us to the fine point of the matter. What Churchill called history's "terrible, chilling words" are about to be pronounced on California's failed leadership: "too late."


A federal loan guarantee or bailout may be the only way to buy time for the restructuring of California's bureaucracies to take effect, but the discussion remains academic until and unless the state actually adopts the replacement structures, unburdens its shrinking productive sector and presents a credible plan to redeem the state's crushing debt and looming obligations.


Without these actions, federal intervention will only make California's problems worse by postponing reform, continuing unsustainable spending and piling up still more debt.


In short, if California won't help itself, the federal government cannot, should not and must not.


And before anyone gets too smug at California's agony, remember this: Congress is now enacting the same policies at the national level that have caused the collapse of California.


So whistle past this cemetery if you must, but remember the medieval epitaph:


"Remember man as you walk by, as you are now so once was I; as I am now so you will be."


The good news is there is still time for the nation to avoid California's fate.


If anything, the collapse of California can at least serve as a morality play for the rest of the nation - unfortunately in the form of a Greek tragedy.

ACTIVIST ANNOUNCEMENTS / URGENT BULLETIN / CONTACT ALL TRUCKERS OPERATING IN THE UNITED STATES A.S.A.P.!



OOIDA - OBAMA NEEDS TO HEAR FROM ALL TRUCKERS NOW!




The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association notified members on Friday, Aug. 7, that Obama and Mexican President Felipe Calderon will be discussing cross-border trucking at the North American Leaders Summit on Sunday, Aug. 9, in Guadalajara, Mexico.






THE ASSOCIATION'S MESSAGE IS URGENT!
OOIDA said President Calderon is expected to pressure Obama to move forward with opening U.S. roads to Mexico-domiciled trucking companies and truck drivers. The Association is asking its members to contact Obama administration officials and communicate their concerns immediately.


Recent statements by U.S. government officials indicate that Obama is being advised by individuals in his own administration to give in to pressure from Mexico and the multinational corporations behind the push for Mexican trucks in the U.S. Those officials have stated that they will not be satisfied with a temporary or pilot program. They want full access to the U.S. market for Mexico-domiciled companies and drivers.

“Obama and officials in his administration need to hear from you, your family members and your fellow truckers now,” said OOIDA President Jim Johnston. “We are encouraging our members to pass this message along to everyone they know.”

Johnston said if proponents of cross-border trucking with Mexico have their way, the jobs of all U.S.-based long-haul truckers will be in serious jeopardy. Truckers need to convey that message when talking with government officials.

“In addition, you should tell them that granting Mexican trucks full access to U.S. highways makes no sense because none of the safety or security issues have been resolved on either side of the border,” said Johnston.

OOIDA IS URGING MEMBERS TO CONTACT THESE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS -


Office of the U.S. Trade Representative:Call the USTR’s Intergovernmental Affairs & Public Liaison office at 202-395-6120 or fax 202-395-3692

Obama: Go online to http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ or phone 202-456-1111 or fax 202-456-2461.

U.S. Department of Transportation:To phone, call 202-366-4000.

Congress: To call your two senators and your representative in the House, call the U.S. Capitol switchboard at 202-224-3121 and provide the operator with your home ZIP code. The operator will connect you with the offices of your elected representatives.



To write and/or fax to your U.S. Representative:https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml

Thursday, August 6, 2009

ACTIVIST NEWS / THE WHITE HOUSE BACKS OUT OF THEIR 'SNITCH ON YOUR NEIGHBOR' PROGRAM / THIS ACTIVIST SAYS IT ALL.....


Folks.....

This is where they asked their radical liberal cronies to snitch on anyone who did not agree or approve of their so-called health care legislation.


COWARDS!!!!!


Within the last couple of hours, they removed that plea for telling on your friends and neighbors.


Maybe it is because Glenn Beck, Laura Ingraham, Mark Levin and many other talk show hosts, along with radio and television news covered the subject in mass and the White House called-off the entire idea. The media has not stopped their campaign and are covering the unconstitutional request by the White House again today.

Did anyone notice how these White House lackeys put their feet in their mouths when called on their first amendment debacle, now say that they are removing the snitch website?

The corrupt Obama administration and our federal representatives are worse than jackals. They LIE to the hilt when they suggest that we ordinary concerned citizens were paid and brought to town hall meetings by insurance companies! Do they understand that this will only bring more of we citizens into the fold of dissenters?

They are so desperate that they are showing more of what they really are, corrupt Progressives, radical Socialists, Statists, Marxists, liberal Fascists.....take your pick as there all are represented among Obama's administration, including his so-called czars. as well as many of our federal representatives as well. It is so blatantly obvious to all who are awake to reality.

We know who they are and they cannot pull the wool over anyone, with the exception of the totally ignorant. Take a look at the biographies and resumes of all of the so-called czars. Information on all Obama czars will be posted later.

Glenn Beck will include a special segment on his television show tomorrow, about how the so-called ObamaCare will do the all SENIORS. Remember, everyone gets old, this awful legislation would affect everyone eventually. It is called Soylent Green, or in other words, C R E E P I N G E U T H A N A S I A ! Also, tune in today for Glenn's special segment on the AARP connection. You will not want to miss that either.

The Obama administration are tyrants, dictators,, with no regard for life other than their own. They prove it by NOT wanting to have the SAME health care plan as that they are attempting to force down the throats of the general public.

ARTICLES AND VIDEOS RELATIVE TO THE NATIONALIZED "HEALTH CARE" TOWN HALL MEETINGS:

The idiot liberals and their Marxist leader Oama, are now amazed to see TRUE GRASSROOTS citizens giving them a rousing taste of their own medicine. It is good to see the radical liberals squirm and run for cover.


OBAMA COMPLAINS AND WANTS THE GRASSROOT CITIZEN PROTESTERS TO STOP TALKING. WE ARE LAUGHING OUT LOUD AT THAT ONE.

VIDEO - OBAMA HAS THE NERVE TO TELL AMERICAN CITIZENS -



"Don't want the folks who created the mess to do a lot of talking".



Is he kidding? He has created the biggest mess in the history of the country. Tea Party protesters, Town Hall participants and the like have a constitutional first amendment right to speak up with passion!

http://www.breitbart.tv/obama-dont-want-the-folks-who-created-the-mess-to-do-a-lot-of-talking/

MORE ARTICLES AND VIDEOS

http://sweetness-light.com/archive/was-pelosi-so-wrong-about-swastikas

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_080509/content/01125110.guest.html

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/07/health-care-town-hall-turns-violent-tampa/

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/25891.html

http://www2.tbo.com/content/2009/aug/06/protests-passions-roiling-town-hall-meeting-health/news-metro/

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/6563705.html

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/07/white-house-collect-fishy-info-health-reform-illegal-critics-say/

http://www.freep.com/article/20090807/NEWS06/908070387/Tempers-flare-over-health-care

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99TKCRG0&show_article=1


AUDIO TAPE AND ARTICLE - ABOUT THE S.E.I.U. UNION MEMBERS THAT BEAT UP A TOWN HALL PARTICIPANT -

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/07/obama-allied-unions-threa_n_254204.html


THIS IS IMPORTANT - IF YOU MISSED IT, HERE IS AN OLDER POST THAT CAN BE FOUND ON THIS SITE. IT CONTAINS THE LINKS TO THE COMPLETE SO-CALLED HEALTH CARE BILL AND A LONG LIST OF SPECIFIC DETAILS TAKEN FROM THE BODY OF THE LEGISLATION:



VIDEO -



http://www.breitbart.tv/aarp-reps-cancel-listening-session-after-participants-refuse-to-keep-their-comments-quiet/


VIDEO -



http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/laworder/story/0470FEB3219207458625760B001142AC?OpenDocument

VIDEO - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kxaGfClPws

KEEP FIGHTING BACK!




***Califstarheart ***sunset or sunrise







View Image



Wednesday, August 5, 2009

OBAMA SAYS HE DOES NOT WANT ANYONE TO CRITISIZE HIS DANGEROUS & COSTLY SO-CALLED HEALTH CARE BILL / WE HAVE FREE SPEECH HERE IN AMERICAL MR. OBAMA!

FROM BRIETBART NEWS -


VIDEO:


Obama In His Own Words Saying Single-Payer Health Care Will Eliminate Private Insurance
Not that any conservative had any doubts whatsoever, but this is The One in his own words:

HT: HotAir. Elimination of private insurance is the entire point after all! Here's the longer video of Rep. Jan Schakowski (D-IL)


ATTENTION! To get a better, more clear and even definitive look at what preceded Obama and what he became a part of during his evolvement into Marxism, click on this link, which is from a blog post on this site:

NOTE: More links will be added to this post through the end of this week.
Thanks for your patience!

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

YAHOO NEWS / 'FEDERAL TAX REVENUE PLUMMETING!'




By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER, Associated Press Writer Stephen Ohlemacher, Associated Press Writer – Mon Aug 3, 8:51 pm ET
WASHINGTON – The recession is starving the government of tax revenue, just as the president and Congress are piling a major expansion of health care and other programs on the nation's plate and struggling to find money to pay the tab.
The numbers could hardly be more stark: Tax receipts are on pace to drop 18 percent this year, the biggest single-year decline since the Great Depression, while the federal deficit balloons to a record $1.8 trillion.
Other figures in an Associated Press analysis underscore the recession's impact: Individual income tax receipts are down 22 percent from a year ago. Corporate income taxes are down 57 percent. Social Security tax receipts could drop for only the second time since 1940, and Medicare taxes are on pace to drop for only the third time ever.
The last time the government's revenues were this bleak, the year was 1932 in the midst of the Depression.
"Our tax system is already inadequate to support the promises our government has made," said Eugene Steuerle, a former Treasury Department official in the Reagan administration who is now vice president of the Peter G. Peterson Foundation.
"This just adds to the problem."
While much of Washington is focused on how to pay for new programs such as overhauling health care — at a cost of $1 trillion over the next decade — existing programs are feeling the pinch, too.
Social Security is in danger of running out of money earlier than the government projected just a few month ago. Highway, mass transit and airport projects are at risk because fuel and industry taxes are declining.
The national debt already exceeds $11 trillion. And bills just completed by the House would boost domestic agencies' spending by 11 percent in 2010 and military spending by 4 percent.
For this report, the AP analyzed annual tax receipts dating back to the inception of the federal income tax in 1913. Tax receipts for the 2009 budget year were available through June. They were compared to the same period last year. The budget year runs from October to September, meaning there will be three more months of receipts this year.
Is there a way out of the financial mess?
A key factor is the economy's health. The future of current programs — not to mention the new ones Obama is proposing — will depend largely on how fast the economy recovers from the recession, said William Gale, co-director of the Tax Policy Center.
"The numbers for 2009 are striking, head-snapping. But what really matters is what happens next," said Gale, who previously taught economics at UCLA and was an adviser to President George H. W. Bush's Council of Economic Advisers.
"If it's just one year, then it's a remarkable thing, but it's totally manageable. If the economy doesn't recover soon, it doesn't matter what your social, economic and political agenda is. There's not going to be any revenue to pay for it."
A small part of the drop in tax receipts can be attributed to new tax credits for individuals and corporations enacted in February as part of the $787 billion economic stimulus package. The sheer magnitude of the tax decline, however, points to the deep recession that is reducing incomes, wiping out corporate profits and straining government programs.
Social Security tax receipts are down less than a percentage point from last year, but in May the government had been projecting a slight increase. At the time, the government's best estimate was that Social Security would start to pay out more money than it receives in taxes in 2016, and that the fund would be depleted in 2037 unless changes are enacted.
Some experts think the sour economy has made those numbers outdated.
"You could easily move that number up three or four years, then you're talking about 2013, and that's not very far off," said Kent Smetters, associate professor of insurance and risk management at the University of Pennsylvania.
The government's projections included best- and worst-case scenarios. Under the worst, Social Security would start to pay out more money than it received in taxes in 2013, and the fund would be depleted in 2029.
The fund's trustees are still confident the solvency dates are within the range of the worst-case scenario, said Jason Fichtner, the Social Security Administration's acting deputy commissioner.
"We're not outside our boundaries yet," Fichtner said. "As the recovery comes, we'll see how that plays out."
The recession's toll on Social Security makes it even more urgent for Congress to address the fund's long-term solvency, said Sen. Herb Kohl, D-Wis., chairman of the Senate Aging Committee.
"Over the past year, millions of older Americans have watched their retirement savings crumble, making the guaranteed income of Social Security more important than ever," Kohl said.
President Barack Obama has said he wants to tackle Social Security next year, after he clears an already crowded agenda that includes overhauling health care, addressing climate change and imposing new regulations on financial companies.
Medicare tax receipts are also down less than a percentage point for the year, pretty close to government projections. Medicare started paying out more money than it received last year.
Meanwhile, the recession is taking a toll on fuel and industry excise taxes that pay for highway, mass transit and airport projects. Fuel taxes that support road construction and mass transit projects are on pace to fall for the second straight year. Receipts from taxes on jet fuel and airline tickets are also dropping, meaning Congress will have to borrow more money to fund airport projects and the Federal Aviation Administration.
Last week, Congress voted to spend $7 billion to replenish the highway fund, which would otherwise run out of money in August. Congress spent $8 billion to replenish the fund last year.
Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass., chairman of the House subcommittee that oversees fuel taxes, is working on a package to make the fund more self-sufficient. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which doesn't back many tax increases, supports increasing the federal gasoline tax, currently 18.4 cents per gallon.
Neal said he hasn't endorsed a specific plan. But, he added, "You can't keep going back to the general fund."

Monday, August 3, 2009

'CALIFORNIA'S LARGEST STATE EMPLOYEES UNION APPROVE STRIKE' / THE CORRUPT, CRIMINAL OBAMA UNION THUGS ARE AT IT AGAIN!
























































REMEMBER THAT OBAMA AND HIS CORRUPT CONTINGENCY IS CONNECTED TO VIRUTALLY ALL OF THE ULTRA-RADICAL LEFTIST ORGANIZATIONS, ALLIANCES, MOST UNIONS, FOUNDATIONS. WHAT HE IS CONNECTED TO IS SO VAST AND CONVOLUTED, THAT IT WOULD TAKE A LIFETIME TO SORT IT ALL OUT.

VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCjIvdM9LBE&feature=PlayList&p=788A379D232B05F7&index=7


California's largest state employees' union voted on Saturday to approve a strike authorization measure to protest furloughs of state workers and pressure state officials to ratify its labor contract.

A spokesman for Service Employees International Union Local 1000 said a strike was not imminent but that the vote authorized union officers to initiate certain job actions, including a strike if necessary.

The SEIU represents about 95,000 state employees, including clerical workers and teachers. The group's labor contract with the state expired last year, SEIU spokesman Jim Zamora said.
The union negotiated a new deal with Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's administration in February, but the contract has not been ratified by the state Legislature. Earlier this week, the Republican governor signed a bill that closed a more than $24 billion budget gap. Under the legislation, furloughs will continue for state workers for three days a month, cutting their pay by 15 percent. "We feel that he (Schwarzenegger) really undermined any kind of a contract deal by pushing these furloughs on folks," Zamora said. The SEIU said the strike authorization was approved by 74 percent of its membership. (Reporting by Gabriel Madway; Editing by Peter Cooney)
THE S.E.I.U. (SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION) HAS BEEN BUSY THIS WEEK, INTIMIDATING PEOPLE, BEATING THEM UP.....THEIR USUAL NASTY TACTICS. HERE IS AN EXAMPLE OF SOME OF THEIR BRAND OF BRUTALITY THAT WAS THRUST UPON INNOCENT TOWN HALL PARTICIPANTS -
By Michelle Malkin • August 6, 2009 11:44 PM
Scroll for updates…
THE ST. LOUIS TOWN HALL MEETING AND S.E.I.U THUGS BEAT UP BLACK MAN - VIDEOS:
In May, I told you how the Service Employees International Union’s $61 million investment in Barack Obama paid off with cabinet appointments, executive orders, key personnel slots, and legislative goodies.
Now, the SEIU thugs are looking out for The Boss. In Tampa, Florida and St. Louis today, the Purple People turned out to give cover to members of Congress targeted by Tea Party activists and town hall protesters. For the first time, the town hall protests were marked by physical aggression. More on the St. Louis arrests of confrontational Obamacare activists here. (Just like Obama wanted: “In your face.”) This is no coincidence.




I’m excerpting a portion of my Culture of Corruption chapter on the SEIU. This is what you are up against.
***




EXCERPTED FROM Chapter 7, “SEIU: Look for the union label,” Culture of Corruption




“The persuasion of power”




Asked about his organizing philosophy, Andy Stern summed it up this way: “[W]e prefer to use the power of persuasion, but if that doesn’t work we use the persuasion of power.”




Stern and his shock troops have bullied companies from private equity firms to Burger King to food management company Aramark, who have resisted SEIU’s attempts to organize their workers.




The Purple People have organized aggressive protests and a “War on Greed” campaign to pound the employers into submission.




One of the besieged targets, security provider Wackenhut Services, battled SEIU’s attempts to gain exclusive representation for its employees. The company already ten other unions representing its workers. Initially unbowed by a massive, malicious negative publicity campaign against them, Wackenhut blew the whistle:




The SEIU seeks membership growth through aggressive “corporate campaigns” that have a blunt message to employers, “Let us unionize your workforce or we will destroy your reputation.” This tactic has been used against a number of organizations to include Wal-Mart,


Kaiser Permanente, Advocate Health Care, Catholic Healthcare West, and Sutter Health.




SEIU is attempting to coerce The Wackenhut Corporation and WSI to recognize it as the “exclusive” collective bargaining representative throughout Wackenhut. Wackenhut declined to enter into such an agreement. The SEIU responded with a corporate campaign that is intended to damage WSI’s reputation and relationships with our clients.




Their campaign tactics include distributing misinformation, distortion and omission of fact through the media, conducting demonstrations in proximity of work sites in an effort to disrupt normal client operations, and aggressively attempting to intimidate or influence clients.




But after filing a racketeering lawsuit against the SEIU, a weary and drained Wackenhut entered into an agreement allowing its employees in nine cities to choose SEIU as its bargaining representative. Behold the “persuasion of power.”




Showing an appalling lack of concern for the well-being of its members, the SEIU upped the ante in a representation battle with the University of Miami in 2006. The union fought tooth and nail against a true, democratic unionizing election for campus janitors using a secure, federally monitored secret ballot. Stern personally escalated the dispute, joined the fasters, and demonized then-university president Donna Shalala (yes, that Donna Shalala of Clinton yore).




She lashed back:




We are devastated that the union is risking the health and well-being of our students and the Unicco employees by sanctioning an activity as drastic as a hunger strike. Hunger strikes have never been used in this country to oppose an election. We have urged both parties to continue daily discussions until this issue is resolved. A free election for or against unionization is a federal statutory right.




In the end, the SEIU relented to a federally monitored election. But at what price? Five SEIU members were hospitalized, one with a minor stroke. Wackenhut Corporation chief operating officer Paul Donahue, expressing sympathy for the University of Miami’s plight, saw the big picture:




The bullying, protesting, harassment, contrived events and demands will continue indefinitely because the union has millions of dollars in dues money from hard working janitors and other service workers which can be spent on ruining the reputation of businesses instead of bettering the lives of those workers that contributed.




Indeed, no one has felt the blunt force – and physical danger — of Stern’s “persuasion of power” more than workers themselves.




In Oakland, Stern and his Washington crew imposed a trusteeship on a 150,000-member local that had publicly opposed SEIU strong-arm tactics. The D.C.headquarters (knee deep in ethical mud) accused the local – known as SEIU United Healthcare Workers West (UHW West) – of financial malpractice and misconduct. The local fought back, charging the Beltway union leaders with manufacturing the allegations to retaliate and to distract from Washington mismanagement.




The UHW West president, Sal Rosselli, quit the SEIU Executive Board, and formed a new union in February 2009, which declared: “We’re tired of SEIU’s hostile tactics, threatening phone calls, their collusion with employers and governors like Blagojovich, and the corruption of Stern’s appointees like Local 6434 head Tyrone Freeman in Los Angeles, disgraced SEIU Executive Vice President Annelle Grajada, and the appointees who have just taken over what had been our local. We don’t trust them with our contracts, we don’t trust them with our dues—we just don’t trust them.”




In Philadelphia, Stern engineered the hostile takeover of a 150,000-member union representing garment and hospitality workers. Workers United had broken off from the national UNITE HERE union of 450,000 workers.




Progressive New York Daily News columnist Juan Gonzalez, citing SEIU’s agreement with Workers United, called Stern “hellbent on using classic corporate raider tactics to bring a huge portion of the U.S. labor movement under his absolute control.”




The pact included discounted member dues and legal and financial assistance to aid the breakaway group’s efforts to take control of the Amalgamated Bank, the nation’s only union-owned bank. One union official called the power grab “a breathtaking form of imperialism…”



FROM THE DRUDGE REPORT / MONDAY, AUGUST 3, 2009 / U.S. CITIZENS SCREAM OUT TO CONGRESSIONAL REPS. / NO GOVERNMENT HEALTH CARE!













HEAR THEM SCREAM! / READ THE ACCOUNTS OF TOWN HALL FORUMS


VIDEOS:













View Image

Sunday, August 2, 2009

U.K. TELEGRAPH NEWS / PATIENTS FORCED TO LIVE IN AGONY AFTER NHS REFUSES TO PAY FOR PAINKILLING INJECTIONS / AND OTHER RELATED ARTICLES













GOVERNMENT - RUN HEALTH CARE IS A VERY BAD IDEA.

TAKE A LOOK AT WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THE U.K. AND CANADA!


THIS IS INSANITY AND SHOWS WHAT WILL BE IN STORE FOR UNITED STATES CITIZENS IF THE SOCIALIST IDIOTS IN CONGRESS PASS A PUBLIC MEDICAL CARE PROGRAM. EVERYONE NEEDS TO FIGHT HARD AGAINST THIS ANTI-AMERICAN IDEA IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM!

Patients forced to lice in agony after NHS refuses to pay for painkilling injections. Tens of thousands with chronic back pain will be forced to live in agony after a decision to slash the number of painkilling injections issued on the NHS doctors have warned.


By Laura Donnelly, Health Correspondent

Published: 7:45 AM BST 02, Aug 2009



The Government's drug rationing watchdog says "therapeutic" injections of steroids, such as cortisone, which are used to reduce inflammation, should no longer be offered to patients suffering from persistent lower back pain when the cause is not known.
Instead the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) is ordering doctors to offer patients remedies like acupuncture and osteopathy.

Related Articles:




Specialists fear tens of thousands of people, mainly the elderly and frail, will be left to suffer excruciating levels of pain or pay as much as £500 each for private treatment.


The NHS currently issues more than 60,000 treatments of steroid injections every year. NICE said in its guidance it wants to cut this to just 3,000 treatments a year, a move which would save the NHS £33 million.


But the British Pain Society, which represents specialists in the field, has written to NICE calling for the guidelines to be withdrawn after its members warned that they would lead to many patients having to undergo unnecessary and high-risk spinal surgery.


Dr Christopher Wells, a leading specialist in pain relief medicine and the founder of the NHS' first specialist pain clinic, said it was "entirely unacceptable" that conventional treatments used by thousands of patients would be stopped.


"I don't mind whether some people want to try acupuncture, or osteopathy. What concerns me is that to pay for these treatments, specialist clinics which offer vital services are going to be forced to close, leaving patients in significant pain, with nowhere to go,"


The NICE guidelines admit that evidence was limited for many back pain treatments, including those it recommended. Where scientific proof was lacking, advice was instead taken from its expert group. But specialists are furious that while the group included practitioners of alternative therapies, there was no one with expertise in conventional pain relief medicine to argue against a decision to significantly restrict its use.


Dr Jonathan Richardson, a consultant pain specialist from Bradford Hospitals Trust, is among more than 50 medics who have written to NICE urging the body to reconsider its decision, which was taken in May.


He said: "The consequences of the NICE decision will be devastating for thousands of patients.

It will mean more people on opiates, which are addictive, and kill 2,000 a year. It will mean more people having spinal surgery, which is incredibly risky, and has a 50 per cent failure rate."


One in three people are estimated to suffer from lower back pain every year, while one in 15 consult their GP about it. Specialists say therapeutic injections using steroids to reduce inflammation and other injections which can deaden nerve endings, can provide months or even years of respite from pain.


Experts said that if funding was stopped for the injections, many clinics would also struggle to offer other vital services, such as pain management programmes and psychotherapy which is used to manage chronic pain.


Anger among medics has reached such levels that Dr Paul Watson, a physiotherapist who helped draft the guidelines, was last week forced to resign as President of the British Pain Society.


Doctors said he had failed to represent their views when the guidelines were drawn up and refused to support the letter by more than 50 of the group's members which called for the guidelines to be withdrawn.


In response, NICE chairman Professor Sir Michael Rawlins expressed outrage over the vote that forced Dr Watson from his position, describing the actions of the society as "shameful". He accused pain specialists of refusing to accept that there was insufficient scientific evidence to support their practices.


A spokesman for NICE said its guidance did not recommend that injections were stopped for all patients, but only for those who had been in pain for less than a year, where the cause was not known.


Iris Watkins, 80 from Appleton, in Cheshire said her life had been "transformed" by the use of therapeutic injections every two years. The pensioner began to suffer back pain in her 70s. Four years ago, despite physiotherapy treatment and the use of medication, she had reached a stage where she could barely walk.


"It was horrendous, I was spending hours lying on the sofa, or in bed, I couldn't spend a whole evening out. I was referred to a specialist, who decided to give me a set of injections. The difference was tremendous",


Within days, she was able to return to her old life, gardening, caring for her husband Herbert, and enjoying social occasions.


"I just felt fabulous – almost immediately, there was not a twinge. I only had an injection every two years, but it really has transformed my life; if I couldn't have them I would be in despair".